See how Trends Mining reports work
Trends Mining

Grand Slam Tennis Schedule: 22K Searches, Zero Competition

Export JSONExport CSV
Trends Report100 ResultsPublished 2026/06/20 05:53:15

Executive Summary

The data reveals a clear golden opportunity: a cluster of keywords around Grand Slam tennis schedules and dates with massive search demand (up to 22,200 average monthly searches) but virtually no competition (competition index of 0). Despite a recent—and likely seasonal—spike in March–April 2026, these terms have sustained upward momentum over years, and the ad-bid ranges are modest, confirming low commercial rivalry. The seed topic, "french open 2026," also shows explosive growth (avg. 33,100 monthly searches, plus 122% growth in the last month), with many event‑specific subtopics (tickets, dates, draw, betting) following similar trajectories. The risk landscape is typical of seasonal sports events: much of this demand will evaporate after the tournament ends, and many keywords have gaps in longer‑term growth history, making it hard to distinguish a genuine secular trend from a one‑off rush. The highest‑return action is to create authoritative, evergreen content around Grand Slam schedules and the French Open, then amplify it with targeted ad spend during the peak season, while avoiding the few pockets of high competition (e.g., clay‑court shoe reviews).

Data Overview

This report analyzes 100 keywords derived from the seed topic “french open 2026.” The run was conducted on June 7, 2026, targeting global English‑language searches and requesting exactly 100 candidates; the system actually checked 147 terms and successfully expanded 146, so the candidate pool is representative of what Google’s keyword tool suggests around the seed. One keyword is the seed itself (depth 0), 33 are direct children (depth 1) generated by AI expansion, and 66 are deeper derivatives (depth 2) sourced from keyword‑idea mining.

The landscape is lopsided: the highest average monthly search volume is 90,500 (both “Roland Garros tickets” and “aussie open schedule”), while the median is only about 30–50 searches, and dozens of keywords register zero in recent months. The composite opportunity score mirrors this spread, ranging from a high of 1,714.1 down to –179.2, with a small handful of blockbuster terms far outpacing a long tail of negligible ones. Competition is overwhelmingly low: 92 out of 100 keywords have a competition index of 0–10, and only one keyword (“best tennis shoes for clay”) is flagged as HIGH (index 100). This means that, for most terms around the French Open and Grand Slam scheduling, advertisers are not bidding aggressively, and organic ranking barriers are minimal.

Trend & Growth Analysis

We sorted all keywords into four natural groups based on their 3‑month trend direction, 3‑month growth rate, and longer‑period growth signals where available:

  • Sustained rising momentum (trend up, positive 3‑m and 6‑m growth, and upward longer‑term history): The leaders are the Grand Slam schedule group (“grand slam dates,” “Grand Slam tennis schedule,” “tennis major schedule,” etc.) and the French Open ticket/date keywords. For example, “Grand Slam tennis schedule” shows a 3‑month demand jump of 813.6% and a 6‑month growth of 3,794.7% (data basis: avgMonthlySearches=22,200, growth.3m=+813.6%, growth.6m=+3794.7%). “Roland Garros tickets” has grown 171.6% over the last 3 months and 641.7% over 6 months, with a clear multi‑year upward curve (1‑y growth +232.2%, 3‑y +507.3%). “french open 2026 dates” jumped 82.8% in the last month alone, with 6‑month growth of 654.2%.
  • Short‑lived spike (sharp recent gains but missing or negative longer‑period data): Keywords like “french open 2026 odds” (growth.1m=+175%, growth.3m=+266.7%, but 6‑m data is null) and “french open 2026 qualifying” (growth.1m=+600%, all longer periods null) fit here. These are likely early‑cycle searches that will peak right before or during the event and then collapse.
  • Stable / mature (flat or mildly oscillating demand): “Tennis betting odds” (trend flat, avgMonthlySearches=2,400, growth.3m=–20.8%) and “tennis betting odds comparison” (avgMonthlySearches=10, growth all zero) belong in this bucket. They represent baseline, non‑event‑specific interest.
  • Declining (negative 3‑m trend): This includes many historical or list‑style terms such as “Roland Garros champions” (avgMonthlySearches=14,800, trend down –55.6%), “Women’s singles final” (trend –97.4%), and most year‑specific Grand Slam schedule terms from 2020–2023. Their decline signals that searchers are moving on to newer events.

Seasonality is unmistakable. The monthly trend history for “Roland Garros tickets” reveals a reliable annual spike every May (368,000 searches in both 2024 and 2025) that recedes by July. The “aussie open schedule” keyword skyrocketed to 1,000,000 searches in January 2026 before plummeting to 1,900 by April—a classic tournament‑driven peak. Even the broader “Grand Slam tennis schedule” topic shows a clear pattern of elevated searches around each Major (January, May–June, August–September), though its 2026 ramp‑up is unusually large, possibly reflecting an early‑hype effect for the 2026 French Open. Because most of our keyword histories extend only 1–2 years, we can confidentially say the seasonality is real, but we cannot fully separate the periodic event effect from a possible multi‑year growth trend.

Competitive & Commercial-Value Matrix

We mapped demand (avgMonthlySearches) against competitive intensity (competitionIndex) and the bid range (converted from micros to dollars) to identify four quadrants:

  • High demand / low competition (prime opportunity): The Grand Slam schedule cluster (22,200 searches, index 0, bid range $0.27–$1.92), “Roland Garros tickets” (90,500 searches, index 20, bid $0.93–$3.43), “aussie open schedule” (90,500, index 1, bid $0.36–$2.21), “french open 2026 dates” (5,400, index 4, bid $0.12–$1.53), and “tennis racket string tension” (2,900, index 5, bid $0.02–$0.53). These keywords combine substantial audience size with minimal advertiser competition, making them ideal for organic content and cost‑efficient paid acquisition.
  • High demand / high competition (red ocean): Only “french open 2026 tickets” (3,600, index 47, bid $0.68–$3.25) comes close—it sits in the MEDIUM tier, indicating a somewhat contested space. For a tournament‑ticket keyword, the bid range is moderate, suggesting that brokers and resellers may already be active but not yet in a full‑on bidding war.
  • Low demand / low competition (long‑tail filler): The majority of depth‑2 keywords (e.g., “2026 French Open schedule” at 30 searches, index 3; “french open 2026 draw” at 20, index 2) and event‑specific detail terms. They are easy to rank for but offer little traffic.
  • Low demand / high competition (avoid): “best tennis shoes for clay” stands alone with 260 searches, a maximum competition index of 100, and a bid range of $0.31–$1.93. The high competition signals that tennis‑equipment brands and affiliate marketers are fiercely fighting over this small audience, likely because it has strong commercial intent (someone ready to buy). Without a distinct product advantage, entering this arena would be costly and likely futile.

Outlier bid ranges reveal commercial temperature. “french open 2026 odds” (20 searches) has a high bid of $13.77, the highest in the dataset, typical of gambling‑related queries where one successful conversion can offset high traffic costs. “french open 2026 betting” (210 searches, high bid $5.99) and “Tennis betting odds” (2,400 searches, high bid $7.92) similarly point to lucrative but risky niches often dominated by established bookmakers. On the low end, “tennis racket string tension” (2,900 searches) has a maximum bid of only $0.53, suggesting the audience is hobbyist rather than buyer‑ready; content sponsorship or informational ads might work better than direct‑response campaigns.

Semantic Clusters

Reading through every keyword, we identified seven data‑emergent clusters. No external labels were used.

1. Grand Slam Schedules & Dates

2. French Open 2026 Event Details

3. Tickets

  • Keywords: “Roland Garros tickets,” “french open 2026 tickets.”
  • Combined search volume: ~94,100 (Roland Garros tickets alone is 90,500).
  • Avg. competition index: 33.5 (Roland Garros 20, French Open 2026 47).
  • Growth pattern: Both are trending strongly upward, with multi‑year growth verified. Ticket queries have clear seasonal peaks in April–May.
  • Attractiveness: High commercial intent; the bid ranges confirm that ticket resellers are active, but competition is still only LOW to MEDIUM. An authoritative guide on how to buy official tickets, combined with trusted affiliate partnerships, could carve a profitable niche.

4. Betting & Odds

5. Equipment & Technique

6. Rankings & Champions

  • Keywords: “Top tennis players ranking,” “Roland Garros champions,” “Grand Slam winners list,” “Men’s singles champion,” “Women’s singles final.”
  • Combined search volume: ~25,000 (led by “Grand Slam winners list” at 8,100).
  • Avg. competition index: 0.
  • Growth pattern: Most are flat or declining; only “Grand Slam winners list” shows recent positive growth (3‑m) before dipping.
  • Attractiveness: Low to moderate. These are “reference” searches with low commercial intent. They could attract traffic but are unlikely to drive conversions unless paired with related content.

7. Streaming & TV Coverage

Prioritized Opportunity List

After weighing score, search volume, competition, growth, and sustainability, the top 15 keywords (15% of 100) are:

  1. “Grand Slam tennis schedule” (22,200 searches, score 1714.1, comp 0, growth.3m +813.6%, bid ≤$1.92) — Anchor of the highest‑opportunity cluster. A dedicated, regularly updated page could dominate this space with little effort.
  2. “Roland Garros tickets” (90,500 searches, score 442.3, comp 20, growth.3m +171.6%, bid $0.93–$3.43) — Massive demand; content that guides safe ticket purchase and links to authorized sellers would be highly valuable.
  3. “french open 2026” (33,100 searches, score 254, comp 3, growth.1m +122.2%, growth.6m +809.1%) — The primary event hub; must be owned.
  4. “french open 2026 dates” (5,400 searches, score 240.2, comp 4, growth.1m +82.8%, growth.6m +654.2%) — A critical piece of the event puzzle; easy to rank.
  5. “tennis racket string tension” (2,900 searches, score 117.5, comp 5, growth.1m –18.2% but 6‑m +89.5%, bid ≤$0.53) — An underserved technical term with steady multi‑year growth; ideal for an in‑depth gear guide.
  6. “french open 2026 tickets” (3,600 searches, score 116.5, comp 47, growth.6m +184.2%) — Slightly higher competition, but the long‑term upward trend and commercial intent make it worth pursuing.
  7. “french open 2026 betting” (210 searches, score 92.7, comp 5, growth.6m +50%, bid up to $5.99) — A niche with big‑spending advertisers; affiliate content could be lucrative if compliant.
  8. “french open 2026 schedule” (590 searches, score 55.4, comp 3, growth.6m +212.5%) — Lower volume but directly supports the main event hub.
  9. “aussie open schedule” (90,500 searches, score –91.5, comp 1, growth.3m –99.8%) — Despite a negative score due to seasonal collapse, the raw volume is huge; a schedule page covering all slams would capture this traffic when it returns.
  10. “next tennis grand slam” (6,600 searches, score –14.2, comp 1, growth.3m +125%) — The negative score reflects a recent dip, but the 3‑m growth is healthy, and the recurring nature of the query makes it a solid evergreen asset.
  11. “french open 2026 tv coverage” (70 searches, score 213.4, comp 2, growth.3m +52.4%) — Very low volume but extremely easy to win; can be rolled into a broader “how to watch” guide.
  12. “Tennis betting odds” (2,400 searches, score 67.6, comp 4, trend flat) — Stable baseline traffic; a page that compares odds across bookmakers could attract steady visitors.
  13. “french open 2026 draw” (20 searches, score 526.4, comp 2, growth.1m +600%) — Tiny volume but spectacular recent growth; content here will prime for next year’s draw announcement.
  14. “best tennis shoes for clay” (260 searches, score 209.7, comp HIGH) — Included as a caution: the high score may overestimate the opportunity; the HIGH competition means only a brand with a strong offering should attempt it.
  15. “Grand Slam winners list” (8,100 searches, score –73.2, comp 0, growth.1m –18.2%) — Low competition and decent volume, but negative growth and low commercial intent; it’s a traffic play best monetized through display ads or internal linking.

Beware of conflicts: “french open 2026 results” has a score of 189.8 and a 3‑month trend of +80%, but its 3‑month growth rate is actually –35.7%. This clash between short‑ and medium‑term signals means the recent bump could be noise; secondary verification (e.g., Google Trends) is warranted before investing heavily.

Risks & Limitations

  1. Limited historical data: For over half the keywords, growth rates beyond 6 months are null, and many have no history before March 2026. This prevents us from confidently distinguishing a multi‑year trend from a pre‑event pop. We cannot, for example, say whether “french open 2026 qualifying” will be searched at all in 2027.
  1. Seasonal collapse: Most event‑specific terms will lose 80–95% of their volume within two months of the French Open ending. Heavy investment in permanent content must be complemented with an annual update strategy; otherwise, rankings will decay.
  1. Branded/trademarked terms: “Roland Garros” is a registered trademark of the French Tennis Federation; “French Open” is a common‑law mark. Using these in URLs and titles is fine for editorial coverage, but advertising on these terms may be restricted, and selling counterfeit tickets or unauthorized streams could lead to legal action. Player names (Nadal, Djokovic, etc.) carry personality‑rights considerations, though editorial use is generally protected.
  1. Conflicting trend signals: Several keywords exhibit positive 3‑month trend changes but negative 3‑month growth rates (e.g., “french open 2026 tickets” trendChange3m +22.7% but growth.3m –18.2%), indicating that the most recent data points are pulling the average in opposite directions. Treat these as ambiguous and verify with real‑time tools.
  1. Coverage constraints: The run’s expandedCount (146) is close to requestedCount (100), suggesting the keyword miner reasonably saturated the topic space. However, the analysis is limited to English global searches; non‑English and region‑specific queries (e.g., “Roland Garros 2026 billetterie”) are absent.

Action Recommendations

Content Strategy

  • Cornerstone Grand Slam calendar page: Build a single, detailed page titled “Grand Slam Tennis Schedule 2026–2027” that lists all four Majors with dates, venues, and links to deeper event pages. This will naturally target the entire schedule cluster and can be updated annually. (Data basis: the cluster has zero competition and 22,000+ searches.)
  • French Open 2026 hub: Publish an in‑depth guide covering dates, draw, tickets, TV coverage, prize money, and key storylines. Launch it by March 2026 (ahead of the peak in April–May) to capture the full ramp. (Data basis: seed keyword grew 122% MoM in March.)
  • “How to String Your Tennis Racket” tutorial: A step‑by‑step guide, optimized for “tennis racket string tension,” could attract a steady stream of dedicated players year‑round, with minimal competition. (Data basis: 2,900 searches, comp index 5, bid only $0.53.)
  • Ticket‑buying guide: Write an honest, updated guide on how to buy Roland Garros tickets safely, with clear disclosure if using affiliates. This addresses one of the highest‑demand keywords with clear commercial intent. (Data basis: “Roland Garros tickets” 90,500 searches, comp index 20.)

Product Sourcing / Sales

Ad Spend Allocation

  • Peak‑season PPC: Allocate budget in April–June 2026 for exact‑match keywords like “french open 2026 tickets” and “Roland Garros tickets,” and use broad match modified for “Grand Slam schedule” to capture the long tail of schedule queries. The low competition indices predict low cost‑per‑click for most terms. (Data basis: lowTopOfPageBid for “Grand Slam tennis schedule” is $0.27.)
  • Avoid bidding on “best tennis shoes for clay” unless you have a generous return‑on‑ad‑spend target; the high competition index and moderate bid ceiling suggest an over‑saturated auction. (Data basis: competitionIndex=100, highTopOfPageBid=$1.93.)
  • Retarget event traffic after the tournament: build an email or push‑notification list from French Open visitors to re‑engage them for Wimbledon and the US Open, turning seasonal spikes into long‑term audience growth.

Every recommendation above is directly traceable to the specific numbers in the supplied keyword dataset. By acting on the clear signals—massive, uncompetitive demand around Grand Slam schedules and French Open specifics—while minding the seasonal nature and legal boundaries, a publisher or brand can secure strong organic visibility and efficient paid conversions during the 2026 tennis season and beyond.

french open 2026 Trends Mining (General)

Mining run details
Results to review